Both whole cord blood and extracted stem cell samples start from collecting the available blood from the umbilical cord. The main difference between storing whole cord blood and extracted stem cells is the methods used once the blood is received at the laboratory.
Commercial extraction methods are focused on the CD34+ progenitor cell population, a subsection of the whole stem cell population. This sub-population is the one which has been identified as being the major source of cells which reconstitute the bone marrow in individuals with illnesses such as leukaemia. They are not as such stem cells, but progenitor cells (denoted by the +suffix).
Public health institutions have a policy of increasing the stocks of stem cell to provide treatments for leukaemia patients. This is becoming more popular as the number of bone marrow donors is insufficient for the number of patients and the use of multiple partially-mismatched cord blood units to treat adults is becoming common practice. As such the CD34+ sub-population is of key interest to public health banks.
The public health banks have to maximise their storage capacity, and an effective method of doing this is to reduce the volume of the samples thus increasing the number of samples in a tank. Extracting the CD34+ population has become possible by developments in technology. This minimises the amount of sample stored, whilst (for blood disorders) providing a clinically viable sample.
Other private cord blood banks have utilised this technology, effectively ensuring the samples they store are identical in nature to those store in a public bank, but without the foresight and technical expertise to future proof the sample. The skill level required in the laboratory is also lower, as this is automated technology.
Privately banked cord blood samples are not stored with the aim of treating a child with leukaemia, especially in the UK; they are stored because of the possible future uses and other diseases which can be treated using stem cells. The future of regenerative medicine which uses stem cell therapy is the driving reason.
Cells4Life is able to demonstrate via independent peer reviewed papers (see library) that the minimally invasive cryopreservation technique of storing whole cord blood does provide a significantly larger and more diverse population of stem cell types, including Hematopoietic Stem Cells (HSCs), Very Small Embryonic Like Stem Cells (VSELs), Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) and Unrestricted Somatic Stem Cells (USSCs), which are clinically superior even in blood disorder treatments. Further there are high concentrations of cytokines, growth factors and hormones as well as B-cells and T-cells in the sample which are retained. There are numerous research publications which show these are not only clinically relevant but also critical for some cell based therapies
Extracting CD34+ progenitor cells is limiting the use of the sample, and at a time when technology and medicine are advancing rapidly, why would you limit the possibilities?

Order Online
Ask the Midwife







